Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of information revolution effects and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of being negative or positive is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mass communications can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, changing the way of mass communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of revolutionized society, as well as well-communicated individuals, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between an informative communication and ability to be an interchangeable way. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both well-educated individuals and well-balanced society apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, influencing individuals' lives might increase the consequences of information technology. Moreover, fundamental aspects of communication technologies could relate to this reality that the demerits of non-effective communications pertain to a revolutionary communication. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of rapid changes negative effects is correlated negatively with unavoidable permanent effects. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of communication policies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of positive effects on society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of individuals' information prove the significance of information-related changes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | shivek | 100 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | foadihasan | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 77 | view |
- Senior executives should get their employees involved in the decision making process. What is your opinion in this? 80
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for personal life. Discuss. 85
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Nowadays television has become an essential part of life. It is a medium for disseminating news and information, and for some it acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06909090909 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.76530661226 2.71678728327 139% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5299265799 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33980989988 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101390094539 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511094090874 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176177445465 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374891161712 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 53.1260098522 29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 11.5310837438 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.