It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas are giving your opinion and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Recently, the phenomenon taught developed and inherent creativity has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "can any child become good sports person or musician?". Whereas it is a widely held view that some people are born with creativity and specific talents, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, creativity is bound up inextricably with natural ability, which indicates it lead to both critical thinking and creative imagination. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between taught skilled and long-term memory as well as an exponential increase in performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of natural talents is correlated positively with not only genetic features but also teaching techniques.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, professional career attribute to human capability,in that it would come down to shrewd student, human capability, and compulsory education. A salient example of such attribution is personal experiences, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take inherent power for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint educational systems problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to academic achievement, overall score, and even job opportunities. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of modern methods.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that any child can become a good sports person or musician. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | MRK | 88 | view |
- benefits and problems of studying and performing the old play in high school. 11
- With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people are writing letters. Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree? How important do you think i 85
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 88
- Company top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to make any decisions. Discuss. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...uestion 'can any child become good sports person or musician?'. Whereas it i...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ith natural ability, which indicates it lead to both critical thinking and creative ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...nal career attribute to human capability,in that it would come down to shrewd stude...
^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78275862069 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1816301657 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703448275862 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2948339539 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241202669672 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632012928711 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863297612129 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149338954621 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132885704921 0.0609392437508 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.