life experience is better way to learn or formal books.
From the ancient time, education is a crucial part of individual’s life. Most of the experts believe that gathering knowledge through books is best way. However, others reject this notion because they think that only life experience is better way to gain knowledge. I firmly concur that both books and experience are pivotal to acquire proper education.
To commence with, books are true companion of mankind because each and every person read book while learning basics in primary school. Secondly, books provide crucial information about our history which would further aid people to rectify their mistakes in future. Most importantly, every new information print into books, so, it is very efficient way to enhance people’s horizon in education. Finally, in universities, if student want to perform experiments then they have to read precautions from books.
On the flip side, experience provide deep understanding of any subject, to cite an epitome, a survey conducted by The Economic Times reveals that 80% pupils prefer to perform experiments because it is fruitful to memorize information for lifetime. Moreover, experience is crucial factor to get job in professional field instead of only books education. Furthermore, practical and theoretical knowledge is need of contemporary era.
To recapitulate, after analyzing all, it can be said that books and experience has numerous benefits to aspirants in future, and to get lucrative jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2021-04-17 | vahidmetall | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-07 | xiaojia | 72 | view |
| 2020-06-01 | xiaojia | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
... that gathering knowledge through books is best way. However, others reject this notion...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...er aid people to rectify their mistakes in future. Most importantly, every new informatio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ence has numerous benefits to aspirants in future, and to get lucrative jobs.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50222222222 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01392980003 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675555555556 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0970404301 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.166666667 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240722939164 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756815927512 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622995874587 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126317725013 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710128555784 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.