In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society?
Recently , the phenomenon of the trends of becoming old in an array of societies and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this occurrance is beneficail as it regarded by the substantial of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this happening has some detrimental effects on nations.
From a social standpoint, there are several disadvantages of enhancing the number of elderly people in most countries.
These factors are rooted in the fact of having dull society. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the demerits of this situation. Firstly, this event might kill the sense of exciting in the inhabitants' lives. Undoubtedly, the interest and tastes of the old settlers are quite different from the youths and by happening this situation, the government has difficult responsibilty to content all its own populations. Furthermore, loads of activities and tasks will be done slower than past because the old citizens have not sufficient and appropriate energy to do them. Due to these essential reasons the probability of creating a prosperous future for countries will decline.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the occurrance of having old nation due to increasing the number of elderly dwellers has some adherents. They argued that this happening can enhance the amount of experience in society. According to research undertaken by a prestigious world-renowned university, the nations that have this circumstances have fewer faults in their policies.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of becoming societies old are far more outweigh their advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | neelu sharma | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-05 | farshid2370 | 55 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
- We have entered a throw-away society and fill the environment with rubbish. What are the causes and what are your solutions? 11
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development? 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Recently , the phenomenon of the trends of becomin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46785714286 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15515701151 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9977040157 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164128679689 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505777975024 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270103156077 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848800109352 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191307357071 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.