Many sports players advertise sport-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
Over the last few decades, sport industry has become one of the most profitable, mainly due to advertising of related goods. In spite of the widespread belief that sport marketing is certainly beneficial for both the public and players, many consider this tendency as rather disadvantageous. This essay will explore the main pros and cons of this trend and show why it is mostly detrimental.
To begin with, athletes earn significantly more by promoting various sports equipment. In general, becoming famous and using sponsorship to advertise products dramatically increase the income of sport stars, which is an incredible extra motivation for hard training. For instance, the collaboration with Nike and creation Nike Jordan brand brought Michael Jordan about 2 billion dollars. Thus, this is the great opportunity for players to convert their popularity and personal brand value into money.
However, in pursuit of big money unprincipled sportsmen are used to taking advantage of their influence by promoting gambling, which currently is the highest paid advertising. This problem is already affecting the world negatively and unfortunately, nothing sells gambling better then elite athletes. For example, legendary boxer Mike Tyson did not shy away from the advertisement of bookmakers. In addition, people tend to assume that if a particular piece of gear or nutrition suggested by great player made him great, then you could do the same by consuming the same products. Thereby, it is very common for people to google “Kipchoge running shoes” instead of “Kipchoge running program”.
Considering the above, despite all the benefits such as easy income, advertising sport-related products brings more disadvantages, contributing to the gambling plight and misleading belief that anyone can prosper in sports just by spending a little money on certain products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Rafia Jawad | 75 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | woutan | 93 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Yuli | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | Resham | 88 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortages and what could be done to alleviate the problem 80
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 77
- In many towns and cities large shopping malls are replacing small local shops What is your opinion on this Do you think this is a positive development Use your own experiences 84
- Some people think children should be given the freedom to make their own individual choices while others believe constant supervision from parents is required Which position is closer to your own opinion Support your point of view with reasons and or exam 88
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
...d unfortunately, nothing sells gambling better then elite athletes. For example, legendary ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5331010453 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00968663624 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693379790941 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8044697502 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.153846154 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297353982938 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847877862533 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674539161981 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169625089266 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675989555217 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.