Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss
Recently, the phenomenon of working overtime and its corresponding impacts has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. Although contested by many that the matter of workaholic s highly detrimental, such issue is regarded thoroughly both negative and harmful by substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, I am convinced to believe that and working too much time could be a loss, I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the general standpoint, spending too much time at work could provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed a academic experiment discovered current policies. Thus, the detrimental ramification of both increasing rate of physical and mental illnesses apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, working for most of the time of a day might increase the consequences of depression and critical needs. As far as the society is concerned, the ultimate aim of obtaining any occupation is to provide people to become socially active. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of working overtime is correlated negatively with relationship closeness. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of spending too much time working rather than having time for personal life far outweigh its benefits. Not only do the disadvantages prove the significance of this unique phenomenon, but also pinpoint negative potential implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 85
- It is believed that some people are born with creativity and specific talents, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that taught developed creativity, and any child can become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas are giving 85
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 88
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...I was a university student, I performed a academic experiment discovered current ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51428571429 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17004474313 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639285714286 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6400470905 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265199251298 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765765337014 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10400899978 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153420649682 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697063879081 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.