Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life.
Recently, the phenomenon of hard-working people and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the Local people is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that time management can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, having free time can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of working overtime, as well as life facilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered clever people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both spending the time and work-life balance apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, working conditions might increase the consequences of the life span. Moreover, fundamental aspects of satisfied people could relate to this reality that the demerits of time tables pertain to the full-time work. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a private life is correlated negatively with Lazy citizens. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of taking the time.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the personal life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the paid work prove the significance of personal activities, but also pinpoint wasting the time implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses 88
- Some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 80
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44573643411 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12025133464 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651162790698 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1693463836 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291667946669 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955825833056 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605363051594 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158869634332 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288897515515 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.