People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
In recent decades, a highly controversial issue has arisen regarding performing tasks such as banking and shopping with the technologies without face to face communication. I firmly concur with the opinion that it has a profound and detrimental impact on the people's health and on the people social relationship in societies.
To begin with, without face to face communications by technologies, people are facing health problems. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further physical and mental health. Subsequently, final results revealed a highly complex relationship between heart disease and emotions even though heart attacks should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between the employing technologies and people health.
Furthermore, neglecting face to face communications due to technologies engenders detrimental impact on the social relationship. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne university concerning meeting and confronting friends. Indeed, if the scientific research is inextricably linked to forgetting neighbours and physical relationship, the preliminary findings are closely allied with the isolation and depression. Hence, its likely outcomes would be significantly correlated with an adverse effect on the people's relations in societies.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that without communicating face to face, people confront with its detrimental effects such as the health problems and social relationships. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to participating in communities to meet others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-09 | epouei | 85 | view |
- A company should concentrate on sales or reputations as long term strategies in the market Discuss 93
- Do you think the place where a person grew up helps him/her in accomplishing goals in life? Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- How mass communication influence our lives especially the children. Discuss advantages and disadvantages. 85
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... profound and detrimental impact on the peoples health and on the people social relatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0625 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42190175503 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640625 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3577032889 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261215470879 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987679103675 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919618663667 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173042658431 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516260932376 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.87 11.5310837438 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.