Climate inconsistency has burgeoned to become the subject of much controversy. Ironically, people failed to grasp the gravity of its seriousness because they could not feel the impact yet. That is why there has been an ongoing solution that urge people to concentrate on more urgent problem such as pollution and air quality. This essay will discuss why focusing on the subject of air contamination and quality is in fact a good idea to raise the awareness of climate change.
Mankind should immediately channel their attention to the world air quality because it is the most noticeable problem of climate change. Air is the most paramount substance for every living organism on earth including human, it goes without saying that everyone should notice the change of quality. For example, there has been increasing reports of people having lungs diseases because they live in an area with considerably dreadful air condition, it was when they realised that the climate has changed. In sums, mortals cannot live without breathing and they should naturally notice the quality of the air they inhaled.
To add more point, people should reclaiming the air quality by planting more trees. Trees help purifying air by producing oxygen. For example, dense city like New York has better air quality with the existence of Central Park. In shorts, people should start planting more trees in cities to help mitigate the effect of climate change.
This essay has discussed why people should be more attentive to more immediate subject like air condition and quality, not only it raises awareness towards the climate change, it also urges people to plant more trees to nuance the effect. Therefore, I am consummately agree that people should focusing on immediate effect of climate change such as pollution and and air quality.
- "People don't react to climate change because it is too distant. to make the change, we need to focus on the immediate: pollution and air quality." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement. support your point of view with reaso 80
- Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree? 85
- "People don't react to climate change because it is too distant. to make the change, we need to focus on the immediate: pollution and air quality." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement. support your point of view with reaso 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most de 77
- "People don't react to climate change because it is too distant. to make the change, we need to focus on the immediate: pollution and air quality." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement. support your point of view with reaso 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to purify' or 'purify'.
Suggestion: to purify; purify
...lity by planting more trees. Trees help purifying air by producing oxygen. For example, d...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itigate the effect of climate change. This essay has discussed why people shou...
^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...he effect. Therefore, I am consummately agree that people should focusing on immediat...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ect of climate change such as pollution and and air quality.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, for example, in fact, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14141414141 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53923402179 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511784511785 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6895622222 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.071428571 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192897790381 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765898722549 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426021503452 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129713504705 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245694386322 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.