With the right amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, there is an opinion that people can learn anything without teaching by experts in the classroom just by practicing and motivation. Although genius people can effort to learn many things with self-study, it is required to learn many things by the academic way. For the purpose of this essay, I will analyze why I disagree with this viewpoint.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss this view as a very optimistic theory. At first, since the advent of computer instruments like the internet, people could search and know in any field. However, this is not enough due to the lack of good resources in many web pages. For example, when I decided to learn computer programming, I used internet websites such as W3schools and I had not learned all required things and had to participate in the classroom to get lessons.
In addition, if a person gets to skills in an art with self-study, it will not be accepted by companies to employ him. In the sight of managers in the business, skilled-workers should have practical experience in their specialization. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by Tehran University researchers has shown that a significant number of educated people in different fields of industry such as computer and mechanic are unemployed because of the lack of practical experiences.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that despite the benefits of too much practicing and fonding to learn, many arts and knowledge need to teach by teachers and experienced people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-19 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-12 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
- Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Has there been any recent invention that you think proved either beneficial or detrimental to the society?Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 79
- The idea of space travel is fantastic these days and scientists are very fascinated towards it However there are many environmental problems in our planet that we should resolve first before considering space travel that would cost a significant sum What 79
- In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes, and computers. Some of the greatest inventions are due to advancements in medicine, science and technology. What do you think is the most important of the advancements? 80
- is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9411897045 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594696969697 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0604631926 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.636363636 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19975290825 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710430597541 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783780028113 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11519895507 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100212826869 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.