Should be held legally responsible for the actions of their children. Do you agree with this opinion? Support your position with your own study, experience or observations.
Recently, the phenomenon of being legally responsible of the youth's actions and behavior by their parents has sparked a heated debate among the population. Although this idea is beneficial as it is regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponnets views. I am inclined to believe that it can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, there are several advantages of accepting the responsibility of the young generations' acts by their parents legally. These benefits are rooted in the fact of social behavior. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the merits of this responsibility. Firstly, if parents know that they are forced to be respond of their children's activities, they will have more attention to their upbringing and the way of nuture. Furthermore, this responsibility increase the control and the youngstres are monitored by their parents regularly. Moreover, this parental responsibility encourages dwellers to engage in their children activities and leads to enhancing the awareness and addressing an array of confrontations among parents and their descendants.
On the one hand, there is no doubt the idea of making parents admit the corollaries of their children's behavior has some opponents. They asserted that utilizing this idea may diminish the confidence among children. Namely, they will be sure that there is atleast one person to accept their responsibilities and they are able to do everything that they want.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of holding the responsibility of the young people's actions to their parents is far more outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | lmquan | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | lmquan | 11 | view |
| 2018-11-11 | brandnewiman | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | bashirheidari | 77 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research do you agree or disagree Give your own experience and examples 88
- The university will deduct the students' score for late assignments. Opinion and solutions? 85
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day life. What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 20.9802955665 181% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44599303136 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17586596604 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1137582693 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193449964383 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706380013189 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347486639771 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113839683487 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322815601832 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.