Books plays a salient role in gathering knowledge however, with the advancement in technology some proponents argues that books has lost its relevance in terms of providing knowledge. I partially agree with the statement and would like to discuss by perspectives in the later paragraphs.
Firstly, it is bit harsh to say that the value garnered by books are inappropriate and it is hardly possible that in near future the virtuous of books will diminish. We all have cherished and used the information provided by books since the beginning of our school time. The data and the statistics provided in the books are impeccable and the pictorial representation will attract students. In my childhood I prefer to read books as vital source of information.
On the other side, advent in terms of modern technologies has lead many people to argue that books are not providing the real and the valuable information anywhere. There opinion might be correct up-to certain extent because most of the time books are used only for the referential purposes most of the students in-fact the scholars as well are relying on using internet to manifest their deeds. The real importance of books are lost and this has happened with the modern techniques and tools available. It is a grim matter of concern that people have changed their though process about the usage of books.
Hence aforementioned, it can be concluded that the individuals perspectives in terms of book reading is altering with the passing time. But, I personally argues that books will always remain a important part of history and will never will be lost.
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 75
- Fast food has become a part of our society. What is the impact of fast food on human life? 77
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 77
- some people believe that it is good to do multiple jobs,while others believe that it is better to focus on one job?Do you agree or disagree?I 73
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by humans? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...the later paragraphs. Firstly, it is bit harsh to say that the value garnered by...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...gh process about the usage of books. Hence aforementioned, it can be concluded tha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'argue'
Suggestion: argue
...ith the passing time. But, I personally argues that books will always remain a importa...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ly argues that books will always remain a important part of history and will neve...
^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will never be
...in a important part of history and will never will be lost.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01486988848 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79388743429 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57249070632 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7177428659 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.416666667 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185280245481 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669733466064 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245754203109 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106012093638 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256521829468 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.