Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People's perception towards visiting other countries has changed in recent times due to multiple factors such as high availability of budget airlines etc., While visiting any country it is very common to see that foreigners are charged highly to visit any historical places compare to the locals. This essay will discuss why both natives and visitors must be charged same rates while visiting any attractions in host country.
Firstly, when both locals and tourists are charged the same rates then the visitors will feel that they are being treated as local so that they could feel being united within the community. This treatment will certainly help to enhance country's image and thus boost tourism. When I visited Malaysia I was charged quite high rates for all iconic places but when I visited Australia it was different case which made me to feel good and also I encouraged lot of my friends to visit Australia. Secondly, treating both locals and other nationals same will encourage to visit more cultural and historical places which in turn adds lot of value to country's revenue.
Finally, the free marketing of such treatment in social media, such as travel blogs, will, obviously, welcome more other nationals to visit the country. Despite the need to ensure both hosts and visitors should be charged the same rate, some people don't agree to this point as these charges could be a great source of revenue. These people are not aware of the fact that the funds collected for high charges are quite low compared to the growing rate the number of tourists are entering to the country and the generated revenue.
To conclude, I agree that both natives and non-locals must be charged same rates when visiting cultural and historical monuments.
- There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you think that the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from observations or your own experi 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid purchase of over packaged products or is it the responsibility of produces to avoid extra packaging of products.Give your views with any relevant examples of your own experience. 78
- As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom.Do you agree or disagree? 85
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage. What problems will it cause? 80
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'visiting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: visiting
...and other nationals same will encourage to visit more cultural and historical places whi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d be charged the same rate, some people dont agree to this point as these charges co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98976109215 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37896934829 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7285117649 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.2 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 20.9669160288 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315655681083 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131160241041 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721800725017 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210590165213 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212807148506 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.