Some universities deduct students’ marks if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions?
In this modern world, most of the universities evaluate students using assignment based examinations. While some people argue that universities should deduct marks for the late submission of assignments, on my point of view I agree with that arguement because timeliness is one of a major fdactors which effects to personal carreer. In this essay, I shall discuss factors in strengthening my arguement while analyzing both sides of the argument.
Firstly, a lecturer has to provide sufficient time for the assignment, because students need time for research meanwhile balancing their social life and other studies as well. For instance, if the study is too complex lecturers should provide more time compared to the time allowed for theoratical subjects. In addition, lecturers has to appreciate students dedication with high marks.
On the other hand, some people argue that, students should not be penolized for their inability to meet the deadlines. For an examples, if they do not deduct marks for late submission students will not have a n enthusiasm on the subject and there isa risk of not carrying out the assignment as well. However, lecturers are also adviced to look into the situation of the student before deducting their marks. They can also see the past records of the student i arriving this decision.
In conclusion it is recommended to, provide assignments with sufficient intervals because some students can get fed of doing assignments continuously especially when they are studying while being employed. Teachers can encourage students for assignments by adding a proportion of the assignmet marks to the final evaluation by eliminating the pressure of the final exam. Finally, it is also believed to provide interesting topics for the assignments to stimulate students in engaging the task.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Hurry | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | 6tttcj | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Kushi | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | reza_irani | 85 | view |
- Cashless society is becoming a reality More and more people are using credit cards for payment and less people use cash How realistic do you think it is And do you think it is beneficial or problematic 92
- Technology allows us to have a useful and interesting life than in the past Do you agree or disagree 95
- students choose universities where near home or students choose universities that are far away from home 88
- Recently the freedom to work and live anywhere has become the main trend due to the development of communication technology and transportation 77
- Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aminations. While some people argue that universities should deduct marks for the...
^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an example' or simply 'examples'?
Suggestion: an example; examples
...ir inability to meet the deadlines. For an examples, if they do not deduct marks for late s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... late submission students will not have a n enthusiasm on the subject and there i...
^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...lso see the past records of the student i arriving this decision. In conclusio...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32638888889 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92537555624 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6960459789 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.25397266985 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205537707672 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779346399029 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519974959743 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134680005632 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062224623805 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.