Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
In this day and age, there is an ongoing debate about sports stars and film stars as a role model for the young. While there are are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, yet I still believe that celebrities can play a prominent role in youngesters lives. Therefore in this paper, the primary reasons associated with this will be discussed.
One point which I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that well-known individuals would be able to alter the way adolescents live. For instance, according to a recent study undertook by a group of researchers in Tehran University so as to understand the relationship between the amount of achievement of the young whom are choosing a successful person as a main role model. The result revealed that those who had chosen an individual were more likely efficient, outgoing and substantialy interested in expand their horizons. Thus, this makes it clear that why children can be more successful and enjoy more social skills.
Furthermore, this is particularly so given the fact that celebrities, in particular successful sports stars or film stars, have the high standard of living that is so attractive for young generation. As an example, the Hollywood stars, abling to meet and satisfied their needs with ease, they have always been an integral part of the youngesters lives. After analyzing this, without a doubt, it should undeniably be accepted that these persons play a vital role not only in the young lives, but also to determine and set a gole for their future.
As seen above, I once again reaffirm my sentiment that although the condition of the famous people’ life could cosiderably and positively effect on the young lives, today’s parents should wisely have to be aware of the childrens attitudes towards their targets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | NancySood | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Dilpreet singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Majheal Singh | 77 | view |
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 11
- The world s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants for our planet and give the solution 75
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 85
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...a role model for the young. While there are are certainly valid arguments to the contra...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... a prominent role in youngesters lives. Therefore in this paper, the primary reasons asso...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...oup of researchers in Tehran University so as to understand the relationship between the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermine and set a gole for their future. As seen above, I once again reaffirm my ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07046979866 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83010871472 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610738255034 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9932109226 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.363636364 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186253156204 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753372786256 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11657897494 0.071462118173 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111375088309 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851166725507 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.