tourism in under developed
The importance of tourism in under developed countries which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that when tourism are come the under developed centuries the economic growth will grow. Another pivotal aspect of this trend argument is that from developed countries people are come in India. Needless to say, all these merit stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that tourist are promoting western culture and eventually diminishing their original culture. For example, British tradition has affected Indian culture severely in the present modern era. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of tourism in under developed countries are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-20 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | ahmed0001 | 77 | view |
| 2020-10-24 | Patrick_17 | 70 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Gohar Khan | 55 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4243697479 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72793612054 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584033613445 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8531300895 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.583333333 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224033265262 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078666004405 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12230043399 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159190574641 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103560836235 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.