Playing games is fun only when you win. do you agree or disagree with the statement.
The importents of playing games in fun only when you win which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent yars. In my opinion the latter proposition appears to be more rational, This essay will further elaborate my view for favouring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that many people playing games as a for fun but other kind of people playing game body fitnees and other physically activity. For example, the one of the biggest playing in national level runner and all running win in commonwealth, and this person not play game as a for fun.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects in not playing games is fun only bvut person not allow to funning game. Hence , it is opparent why many are against favour of this trend.
To conclusion,according to the aforementioned above one cxan rech to a conclusion that the benefits of playing game are indeed too treat to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is benefici...
^^
Line 11, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... person not allow to funning game. Hence , it is opparent why many are against fav...
^^
Line 15, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , according
...favour of this trend. To conclusion,according to the aforementioned above one cxan re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 128, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to treat'?
Suggestion: to treat
...the benefits of playing game are indeed too treat to ignore.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94036697248 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77633080889 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56880733945 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.7778362573 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.625 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246308699323 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108924013866 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106571356257 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14328194036 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411504130939 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.