Wealthy nations are required to share their wealth with poorer countries. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "wealthy nations are required to share their wealth with poorer countries" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that developed countries might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that sharing the wealth can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, sharing the wealth of wealthy nations with poorer countries can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that the poverty elimination and sharing resources are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of wealthy nations in the world. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both being a rich country and donating the wealth distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, not sharing the wealth of wealthy countries with poorer nations might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of global hunger. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the world's financial status can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of equity in the wealth distribution can pertain to the first-world countries. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the economic power of poorer countries were correlated positively with increasing national productions, the local authorities would ultimately address more income. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of sharing policies.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of sharing the wealth of wealthy nations with poorer countries far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2021-10-20 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | Behnaz fallah | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | ahmed0001 | 77 | view |
| 2020-09-12 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals 88
- The table below shows the consumer durables telephone refrigerator etc owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983 Write a report for a university describing the information shown below 73
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree with 89
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of anthropologists in work after five years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the m 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73154362416 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12469988649 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.296007698 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.272727273 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43073205687 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158040442175 0.0925447433944 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12217437794 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273811627539 0.151781067708 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014977659049 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73154362416 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12469988649 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.296007698 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.272727273 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43073205687 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158040442175 0.0925447433944 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12217437794 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273811627539 0.151781067708 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014977659049 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.