What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late?
Recently, the deducting marks on student's work has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what is the effects of deducting marks on student's work?". Whereas it is a widely held view that deducting marks have a negative effect in student's work, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, assesment methods are bound up inextricably with fair test, which indicates they lead to both written examination and traditional assesment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between continues examination and student performance as well as an exponential increase in job opportunities. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of work environment is correlated positively with not only overal score but also academic achivemnet.
Within the realm of bussiness world, without the slightest doubt, major success attribute to qualification, in that it would come down to long-term memory, average scores , and learning environment. A salient example of such attribution is rofessional career, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take student marks for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint fault test system problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to academic study, mental capability, and even natural ability. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of academic certification.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that deducting marks have not negative effects on student's life. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-09-10 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 55 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 70 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 55 | view |
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example. 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...down to long-term memory, average scores , and learning environment. A salient exa...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ting marks have not negative effects on students life. However, with the benefit of hind...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74402730375 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16244046008 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675767918089 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5033520493 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.461538462 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223603013679 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662246879847 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105660276332 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139723600201 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133616862225 0.0609392437508 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.