TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-09 | mgrajapt | 65.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-10-27 | naznazu | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-01-17 | mgrajapt | 71.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | 10.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-08-08 | dshah6611 | 60.00 | Check this speaking |
- 949 is this different from the kind of achievement that made people famous in the past 60
- 419 do you think consumerism is a positive or a negative development? 80
- 1832 do you think that the possibility of working from home via the internet will lead to many people going back to the countryside? 70
- 2636 Do you live in a house or a flat? 60
- 965 how important is it for a culture to have musical traditions? 80
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.