TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | 10.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-08-08 | dshah6611 | 60.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-07-17 | Mennatallah | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | Check this speaking | |
| 2018-10-15 | mgrajapt | 71.00 | Check this speaking |
- 2877 describe a colorful place that you visitedyou should saywhere you wentwho went there with youwhy you wentand why it left an impession on you. 80
- 1989 is it acceptable for couples to live together without marrying? 77
- 1181 what are advantages and disadvantages of making films of real life events? 10
- 2141 do people spend more time with friends or with relatives? 60
- 1011 what do you like about traveling to work this way? 80
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.