Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views
Should teenagers obtain a short term job? While some nationalities let their teen to have a part-time job as a transitional period from the youngster to the adult. The others have found the significant negative consequences. We will take a close look at both views before reaching the decision that part-time jobs seem to have more advantages than disadvantages.
Firstly, Teenagers who are reaching the age of responsibility and financial independence, and there are various reasons that teens want to work. Most of their involvement in work is motivated by desire to buy things. Typically, they tend to spend their money on clothing, saving for college or helping their families with the living expenses. For this reason, the beneficial things to adolescents who get the part-time jobs are the valuable work experiences, which are excellent for their resumes, helping them to land to a well paid job. Beside that, gain useful skills such as: communication skills, how to handle people would help to build up their confidences, accumulate their maturities, leading them to the independent life in the future.
On the other hand, there are some studies, suggesting the bad sides of getting the part-time jobs. With the lack of academic activities may discourage the working teens from going to school that is responsible for the low grade in school. Moreover, balancing between work and school could be hard to students then the increasing of stressor in their environment are claimed for the negative views of work.
In summary, like two faces of a coin, obtaining a job do have its pros and cons which have diffirent effects to our young generations. However I strongly believe that teenagers should be encouraged to have a part-time job.
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 95
- The table below gives the information on consumer spending on different items in five five different countries in 2002. 61
- The information on consumer spending on 5 countries in 2002 56
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Should teenagers obtain a short term job...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bs. With the lack of academic activities may discourage the working teens from go...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reasing of stressor in their environment are claimed for the negative views of wo...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...irent effects to our young generations. However I strongly believe that teenagers shoul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88006634315 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625874125874 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.583915942 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.928571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241088657111 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909104557787 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833726257297 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161912706502 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983430335077 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.