TPO-36
The reading and the lecture are both about a cloud seeding. The author of the reading provides the evidence which suggests cloud seeding is effective in protecting crops from hail. The lecture casts doubt on the argument made in the lecture. He thinks the Cloud seeding is not an effective measure.
First of all, according to laboratory experiment in the reading article, when the silver iodide is added to the cold water vapor, light snow is form instead of the hail pellets. The lecture opposed this idea.He suggests that the laboratory situation is different from the real situation. Silver iodide may prevent any the precipitation. It is the bad thing because seeding the area may reduce the availability of water. The crop may get damaged due to the lack of water.
Second, evidence from Asia, as suggests in the article states that the cloud seeding has been successfully used to control the hail in urban areas and could help to control it in the farm of the United States. This point is challenged by the lecture. He suggests that the Urban area is much polluted than the farm area in the US. Hence, cloud seeding may not be favorable on the farm of the United States.
Third, the author od the reading has provided the evidence of the local study. The study found that the cloud seeding has reduced the hail damage. However, the lecture, on the other hand, suggests that the cloud seeding has diminished the hail not just in an area where the silver iodide sprayed but also in the many areas. It suggests that the hail was reduced by the natural variation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-17 | NoraLuna | 3 | view |
| 2018-12-31 | Bassem Tadros | 3 | view |
| 2018-04-30 | kpatel | 3 | view |
| 2018-04-30 | kpatel | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-28 | arshia-unite | 81 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ffective in protecting crops from hail. The lecture casts doubt on the argument mad...
^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
... pellets. The lecture opposed this idea.He suggests that the laboratory situation ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, third, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70909090909 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35032334684 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476363636364 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1611994302 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.1764705882 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.