Some organisations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.
The importance of employees' decision in organisation's goods and services, which was always debated, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of decision making process has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on organisations integrate employees in decision making process. It can be agreed that employees involvement has some positive impacts, but some people claim that it has some negative impacts as well. This essay will elaborate how beneficial to involve employees in organisation decision and thus will lead to a logical reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why employees should be included in any decision related to organisation but most conspicuous one steam from the fact that employees have more idea than higher level manager. Because employees work on the field. For example, employees works really hard to achieve organisations' goal and if they are also included for goods and service decision, they will give best solution, fell proud about them and organisation. Employees put more and more efforts to achieve those goals in which they included. Thus, every organisation should include employees for decision making process.
On the contrary, some people adopted an opposing view that centralising decision making process has more success rate than decentralising. Employees are not capable of taking or giving any kind of suggestion in organisation's higher level decision. For example, employees at lower level in organisation are not well educated. They don't know about management, finance, and marketing.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that employees should be involved in decision making process of their goods and services but their replays should not be given as important as higher level managers'.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | manussekhar | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | manussekhar | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | Rajnikant Chauhan | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | manussekhar | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | manussekhar | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...n making process. It can be agreed that employees involvement has some positive impacts, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lead to a logical reasoned conclusion. At the outset, there are numerous reason...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to organisation but most conspicuous one steam from the fact that employees have ...
^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ve more idea than higher level manager. Because employees work on the field. For exampl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'give the best'.
Suggestion: give the best
...r goods and service decision, they will give best solution, fell proud about them and org...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ganisation are not well educated. They dont know about management, finance, and mar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, thus, well, for example, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54285714286 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9032002047 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9118348202 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420627751688 0.242375264174 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145338459247 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980563321288 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258578707051 0.151781067708 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102910889697 0.0609392437508 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.