Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning practical courses instead f the tearetical ones in schools and colleges and its corresonding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although these training courses are highly beneficial as they regarded by a substantial number of individuals both constructive and psitive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that these courses can be plus as they could develop brilliant aspects for their adherents.
From a social standpoint, adding practical courses to the educational curriculum can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact of enhancing many skills. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed am academic experiment which discoverd the influence of technical courses on the youths. Not only do these technical courses make courses more understandable but also make pupils bacome qualified and skilled workers in future. Furthermore, they enhance some essential skills among the students including teamwork, interpersonal, oral, writing and technical skills which are quite significant in order to achieve the prosperous future. Moreover, the training courses lead to acquire both knowledge and experience which will be utilized for finding an appropraite vocation.
On the other hand, there is no doubt these practical courses have some opponents. Their opponents augued that providing the equipment and facilities which are used for them is quite pricely, and by this budget schools can hire knowledgeable tutors.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe the benefits of instructing some practical subjects in schools far more outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | maryam2 | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | MehdiKhodadadi | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | arami | 88 | view |
| 2018-11-07 | Krishn Patel | 85 | view |
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- The only way for decreasing Air pollution is increasing fuel price, what is your opinion 88
- Can the internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ctical courses instead f the tearetical ones in schools and colleges and its correso...
^^^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ls bacome qualified and skilled workers in future. Furthermore, they enhance some essenti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66795366795 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96499455938 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637065637066 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8350397865 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127434722597 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500822248982 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282876712107 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818259362368 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302502277043 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.