Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The issue is regarding prioritizing between the immidiate problems and problems anticipated to occur in future. Governments are bound to solve problem a nation faces, whether they are occuring near future or after several years. In my opinion, immidiate problem should enjoy high priority but anticipated problems can not be neglected. However, it largely depends on severety of the problem, probability of occurance and amount of effort required to solve them and not the time of its occurance.
Many nations face problems such as hunger and unemployement. It should be the highest priority of their government to face such problems. Funds and resources should to be utilized to curb such problem. A government that sidesteps such problems and focuses on issues that are yet to occur or may not even occur in future, will fail. Basic needs of citizens,curbing corruption, decreasing crimes are some issues that should always receive highest priority. Any policy which ignores them won't efficiently work. Jobless and starving citizens won't care about a plan to send humans to moon or mars. Such plans are a waste government's money and resources.
On the other hand, there are issues which are anticipated to occur in future, but their severety is high. These issues may require long term planning or building infrastructure for a long period. For example, some experts believe that humans may have to leave earth because it may no longer remain habitable. Such problems however not immitdiate, but require long term planning and efforts. If these are neglected because they are not immidiate then it is possible that in future the planet may not remain habitable and humans may not also have any means of traveling to another safe place.
In sum, immidiate issues should be given higher priority than future problems, but future problems can be neglected. A proper balance should be maintained by government in assigning priority to issues considering their severety, probability of occurance and amount of effort required to solve them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...blems and problems anticipated to occur in future. Governments are bound to solve problem...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... are yet to occur or may not even occur in future, will fail. Basic needs of citizens,cur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , curbing
...ture, will fail. Basic needs of citizens,curbing corruption, decreasing crimes are some ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 430, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'receive the highest'.
Suggestion: receive the highest
...imes are some issues that should always receive highest priority. Any policy which ignores them...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 617, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...to moon or mars. Such plans are a waste governments money and resources. On the other han...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e issues which are anticipated to occur in future, but their severety is high. These issu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21276595745 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74979411752 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6761823514 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2631578947 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289125788734 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096455899218 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790906126478 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189467468756 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112510049532 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.