Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of the responsibility of children's’ behaviour and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of proper fostering is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that correct nurture can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, well-brought-up children can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of proper codes of conducts, as well as supervision of the parents, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the great parental influence on children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being role models for children and well behaving in front of the children can be seen.
Within the realm of science, conflicts between parents might increase the consequence of bully in children. Moreover, fundamental aspects of children's improper behaviour could relate to this reality that the demerits of parents’ conflicts pertain to their weak relationships. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of violent over children is correlated negatively with poverty.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the responsibility of children's behaviour is mostly on parents. Not only do the advantages of proper nurturing prove the significance of strong bonds between parents, but also pinpoint the key roles of parent behaviour towards their spouses.
- Students in school and university learn far more from lessons with their teachers compared to other sources, such as television or the internet. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice than eating meat.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 55
- You have a pen friend living in another country and her/ he curious to learn about the major buildings in your country. Write a letter to your pen friend. In your letter:Greet your friend and say why you are writingBriefly describe a recently built archit 73
- People living in the 21st century are enjoying a better quality of life compared to people who lived in the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 54
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66917293233 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28066058934 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639097744361 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6973594445 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.090909091 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172093060529 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632852319627 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383470510694 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966674680248 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273207137853 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.