The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 years and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance.
The given horizontal chart depicts the information about the results of a survey, which is conducted among two groups of employees: aged between 18-30 years and 45-60 years and it reveals ten factors affecting their work performance. The data is calibrated in percentum.
It can be seen that the individulas who are aged between 18-30 years have maximum (over 80%) chances for personal development whereas, work environment is the least affected of this age group. In addition, work performance influenced by team spirit is equal (around 30%) of both the age groups. Moreover, the affect of job security on workers aged between 45-60 years are almost half than the other age group that is from 18-30 years.
As far as trend is concerned, the highest proportion of people aged from 45-60 years is affected by money. Further, promotion prospects affects the people aged between 18-30 years and 45-60 years are 80% and 50% respectively. Furthermore, the performance affected by working enviornment aged from 18-30 years is almost double than the other age group.
Overall, it is evident that the young workers are more affected by the given factors than the adult employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Mattia95 | 78 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Mandeepkaur123 | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | Love kaler | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-27 | nikhil dutt | 67 | view |
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994. 56
- Some people say that computer games are bad for childrenby all means while others believe that these games are contributing to childrens development. 67
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- The circular chart depicts show the main reasons of land degradation.illustrates tbe affected degrated land in three main causes of during in the year of 1990.it can be shows the percentum. 56
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... results of a survey, which is conducted among two groups of employees: aged betw...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.140625 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63205380801 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1457348788 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398495632439 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181041463519 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104001792298 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243985073915 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113279137555 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.