Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in investments in public transport as an alternative to new roads. The discussion on which alternative the government should invest is a debatable topic and people all around the globe are divided in their opinions. The subject attracts the majority of views from people and remains a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize my opinion by providing relevant examples and explanation before drawing my conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad arguments in favour of my instances. The most preponderant one lies in the fact that improving the network of public transport can bring enormous benefits to the country. In order to get an authentic reflection, an improved public transportation not only reduce the traffic congestion but it can also decrease the environmental degradation. The most impeccable example that could be provided here is that Canada invested to upgrade their public system, resulting in 60 percent less emission of greenhouse gases. Hence, I can substantiate my idea that improving the network of public transport should be one of the top priorities of governments.
Another pivotal aspect of investing in public transport is that it reduces the traffic jams and enhances our quality of life. It is worth perceiving that the reduction in traffic congestion can decrease our level of stress. The most pertinent example that could be provided here is that in Chile the quality of life increased after the government deploy a plan to improve public transportation and ameliorate traffic jams.
To conclude, after taking the above-stated points into consideration, I am inclined to believe that the improvement in public transport is prominent and should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-26 | de.hennies | 77 | view |
- In under developed countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. Discuss it. 77
- The importance of cars and aeroplane in modern life. Give examples. 11
- The violence portrayed on T.V and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Do you think schools should include art, music and sport for children literacy and numeracy? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01612820036 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548611111111 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6517757428 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.923076923 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 7.25397266985 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204959391837 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754792967081 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654943203505 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127657089241 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438156839634 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.