Should governments build more roads to allow more vehicles owner to improve the network of public transport
Globally, governments are facing the uphill task of improving infrastructure to the standard of present day expectations. It's a common debate to identify and substantiate if governments' take enough effort towards upgrading the living standards of their citizens. In this essay, we will elaborate more on the focus areas while coming up to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, owning a car is one of the basic requirements of an individual. Having said that, this scenario comes with certain consequences such as increase of debt for the particular individual and challenges governments are facing to upgrade the infrastructure to support rapidly growing number of vehicles. Moreover, larger cities are overpopulated with vehicles which eventually results in slow moving traffic and delay in commute. As a result, quality of life could have detrimental effect due to the time people spend on road to get from one location to another. Besides, there are more concerns of such phenomenon. To exemplify, there is considerable social and economic impact due to expenditure on fuel and time wasted on roads.
On the other hand, well known method to battle road traffic is to have a better public transportation system. Apparently, countries like Singapore and Hong Kong successfully deployed metro systems in order to transport millions of commuters on daily basis. Likewise, other major cities could deploy such transportation methods for faster transportation which results in time saving and further cost saving for each individual. Surprisingly, more and more governments across the world start to comprehend the value of family time and public transportation definitely contribute much towards that program.
In conclusion, it is quite evident that governments should focus on improving the quality of public transportation instead of spending budget on road development. Even though owning a vehicle is a basic human requirement, it might not be a good option to take with current day challenges. Advantages of public transportation clearly outweigh the benefits of having better road system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | nganvuong | 55 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | bilalaslam239@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
- People in rural areas are moving to urban areas for job and study opportunities Do you think this development is positive 93
- long distance communication is helpful for both doctors and patients. Give your opinion about the statement. 85
- Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to a new environment by establishing a minority community. Discuss these two views and give your opinion 78
- Should governments build more roads to allow more vehicles owner to improve the network of public transport 77
- Some people think music promotes children's learning. However, there are mixed results on the impact of music generated from researchers. To what extent do you agree ? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...e standard of present day expectations. Its a common debate to identify and substan...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51863354037 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16340745321 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.968319525 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0625 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279143404986 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824505980109 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774101341201 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160066199176 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657822138963 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.