people spend more time with their family other than their personal life.
An issue which is frequently generates a great deal of heated debate is people spending more time with their family as well as our personal life. Many academics contend that some people are spending more time with their family while other spending too much time with their professional life. It has offered upsides than drawbacks as a matter of discussion.
To commence with, there are myriad reasons for supporting my viewpoint but the most preponderant one lies in fact is not remote or complicated, but accessible and practical. It has been long considered perfectly justify by proponents to assume that it has provided a plethora of opportunity for many people. It has become an indispensable part of our life. Some people think that people should be spending more time with their family before they died. A classical example of united nation is clearly demonstrated that approximately ninety percent people out of hundred follow to prefer this trend.
On the flip side, these days, people are living in competitive world, without jobs they do not contemplate another source of income. Furthermore, if people are hard working they are improving their living standard. The ample evidence is that people spend more time with their professional life has impact their personal life. A relevant example of national worldwide has observed dramatic shift for public opinion.
To conclude, after pondering over a great deal of though and deliberation with myself about a topic, I came to the conclusion, it has many negative points but we cannot ignore the bright of the side picture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-22 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | sandeep.daksha@gmail.com | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rved dramatic shift for public opinion. To conclude, after pondering over a grea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14671814672 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70404820342 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610038610039 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.15007525 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.592418681379 0.242375264174 244% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195241369738 0.0925447433944 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.233107607279 0.071462118173 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33644717296 0.151781067708 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.237656192637 0.0609392437508 390% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.