A company plans to give money to either improve the environment or promote the arts. Which plan do you think is the better use for the money? Use examples to explain the answer.
Several people around this world keep their own desire and intention of using any commodities. Some use the resource they have in development of country or his family further whereas some utilize to promote architectural designs. Depending upon the separate cases, people choose and prioritize their own desire. Similarly, if any company provides fund, I would like to choose to improve the environment at initial phase. Various reasons behind to bolster the point are recapitulated in the flow.
For the first reason, a well managed environment tremendously delivers pious name and fame in any locality ultimately keeping direct impact in country. Several countries are top listed in less polluted zone which was probably possible because of serious care towards the environment protection vision. Country which can maintain high selective index marks in this aspect surely collects international rewards and acknowledgements.
For second reason, environment itself keeps inherent property in nature as everybody should focus to promote. For exemplifying one can take an example of national parks and conservation areas of country that conserves scores of plants and animal living are the best known and valuable property of any country. The habitat of animals and plants are hugely dependent upon the management aspect of the environment bodies.
Moreover, good environment are always wanted by citizens which can be achieved only after proper management. Everybody wants to guarantee their good hygiene. People are always unwilling to reside on unmanaged environment. Can anyone imagine the unhealthy atmosphere where he is going to life for a while? The answer is obviously no to such chaotic ambience. So the fund will be better utilized if it is used first for better management.
However, in some case arts also mark direct impact to increase national abstract values. For instance, there are several countries that rely upon tourism to lure scores of tourist in their country. Famous architectural designs, newly constructed parks, swimming pool of large areas are elements of arts in human life. Similarly, artificially designed bridges like bridge of San Francisco, London bridges are not only paradigm that are constructed to pass vehicles, in fact they are the most wonderful visual arts ever made in human history. Aren’t such arts are more valuable? Certain companies shouldn’t step forward if it for construction of such designs.
For conclusion, though human life cannot be satisfied with arts only, fund must be intensively allocated for natural environment development. It becomes always an inseparable aspect and challenge in human life to perpetuate the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-15 | Subash Devkota | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-14 | Subash Devkota | 76 | view |
- Students these days should stay with their parents or independent to pursue their study. 66
- Some people think government should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space for example, travelling to moon and other planets. Other people disagree and think government should spend for our basic needs on earth. 90
- Someone you know plans to move to your community. What do you think that person would find pleasant or unpleasant about your community? 3
- A person whose monument you want to build in your country with reasons. 81
- A company plans to give money to either improve the environment or promote the arts. Which plan do you think is the better use for the money? Use examples to explain the answer. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...fe for a while? The answer is obviously no to such chaotic ambience. So the fund w...
^^
Line 11, column 146, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'becomes'.
Suggestion: always becomes
...for natural environment development. It becomes always an inseparable aspect and challenge in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53975903614 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8889807718 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607228915663 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4836156653 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.96 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143501620643 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361549925445 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369492696733 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714070338436 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297787585478 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.