The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree?
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on society due to unemployment and rapid urbanization. While it is claimed that the solution for unemployment is the urbanization, my point of view that the multi-factors are playing a major role behind the effect rather than urbanization. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing different view of the argument.
First and foremost, there are myriad of factors directly effective for unemployment such as quality of education, government support and self-management. For example, in China, globalization and localization with the help of vocational training have been solved the problems related to unemployment. Therefore, it is considered that the urbanization is not the one and only solution for this hazard.
On the other hand, those who believe the other sides of the argument have a different point of view a say that the rapid globalization as the best practice for unemployment. They do not believe the negative effects of rapid urbanization such as air pollution and citizens cacology. For instance, India has been developed a sustainable development program for unemployment with the help of villages in landside, and it is successful up to not.
In conclusion, it is believed that the rapid urbanization is not one and only solution in this glove. In nutshell, governments and professionals should take cognitive actions to remove unemployment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Junaid54 | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | baran.bahrani | 85 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | thanuja | 77 | view |
- Environment problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level. 85
- Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad?Support your point of view with reasons and examples from our own experience. 77
- Comments on we should be a good listener rather than a good speaker 74
- Around the world, solar energy is becoming a more popular source of energy for many households. Why do you think this is so? What are the advantages and disadvantages of using solar energy to power one’s home? 77
- Some people think school leavers should go to find a job rather than university education Others think university education is essential for professional development What s your opinion of these two views 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 5.75862068966 486% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36595744681 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31257942327 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8397058603 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.636363636 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177393392389 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682430111237 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493941147598 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104241903321 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030391228471 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.