The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree?
Recently the phenomenon of lack of employment has sparked an ongoing controversy which leads to a moot question, is development of infrastructure can be the solution? where it is held view that construction of new cities can resolve the problem, however many hold the opposite view that government should focus on region and small town to draw more jobs. In this essay both sides of the argument will be examined with related reason and example along with chosen conclusion.
From the social standpoint, quality infrastructure provide the society with some noticeable effect which are rooted in the fact that availability of jobs and growing sector are inevitably bound up. According to my experience, when i was a university student, i performed an academic experiment which discovered that government development scheme and constructive plans for society do bring good amount of jobs which can play important role to battle unemployment. Thus, beneficial ramification of government sound planning can overcome the job availability.
With in the realm of Science, new inventions can increase the possibility of new business and job in every part of the country. Moreover, bringing up small town and granting extra funding to region pertain to more vacancies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of undeveloped region correlate negatively with the society. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are different solution to every problem but with several compelling arguments I profoundly agree that government can resolve the issue of lack of jobs by not only develop modern cities but also improve on regional areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Junaid54 | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | baran.bahrani | 85 | view |
| 2018-10-11 | thanuja | 77 | view |
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanisation How far you agree 11
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues – such as environmental problems – that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 77
- Restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution Do you agree 73
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
... of infrastructure can be the solution? where it is held view that construction of ne...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...cities can resolve the problem, however many hold the opposite view that government shoul...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nd up. According to my experience, when i was a university student, i performed a...
^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ience, when i was a university student, i performed an academic experiment which ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42753623188 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04155391199 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7843797772 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.181818182 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0733734117582 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0272635552827 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330469895228 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494835060255 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237268051271 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.