As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree?
It is widely acknowledged that making profits is the core operation principle of any enterprises. However, the question of whether a business has community duties or not remains a source of controversy. In my position, I believe that all companies ought to conduct their business in a socially responsible way.
From an economic perspective, if companies are able to generate huge profits, they may offer the society as a whole many tremendous benefits. Firstly, the more money a company earn, the more taxes it will pay to the government. As a result, the authority may have more revenue to spend in key fields, including education and healthcare. Secondly, thriving enterprises could take advantage of their huge income and increased capital to grow their business as well as expand their production, which leads to new job opportunities created within the community.
From a societal perspective, there are two principal causes why companies should take their corporate social responsibilities into consideration. One crucial reason is that the operations and manufacturing processes of businesses make an impact on the environment. Actually, there is a large number of companies that have been held accountable for causing damage to the environment. For instance, instead of installing modern waste treatment systems, many factories discharge chemical waste directly into rivers and seas, contaminating water and killing numerous aquatic animals. Another important cause why corporations should conduct their community duties is that they have money to do so. In fact, many well-known companies such as P&G and Unilever usually enhance their public image through philanthropic actions like giving charitable donations and providing scholarships.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my view that, apart from maximizing profits, fulfilling the social responsibilities should be high on the agenda of all companies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- New technologies have change the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Cycling is more environmentally-friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 89
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving Internet access. Why is it important and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 89
- Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems. Other thinks celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... principle of any enterprises. However, the question of whether a business has community duties or not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... on the environment. Actually, there is a large number of companies that have been held accountab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6323024055 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17349812151 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649484536082 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7812898284 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153945720083 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050677953297 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335147806222 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085667881907 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358263457368 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.