The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts describe how a particular UK school spent money every year in the three years of 1981, 1991, and 2001.
Starting with insurance, teachers’ salaries and furniture and equipment, there was an increase during the twenty years. A significant rise in the spending can be seen in teachers’ salaries from 45% in 1981 to 50% in 2001, despite a peak at 50% in 1991. Meanwhile, the amount of money on furniture and equipment increased from 15% to 23%, in spite of a great dip at 5% in 1991. The two decades also witnessed a growth in insurance from 2% to 8%.
Turning now to other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books, however, there was a declining trend. The expense on other workers’ salaries experienced a decrease from 28% to 15%. The twenty years saw a drop in resources e.g. books from 15% to 9%, with a peak at 20% in 1991.
Overall, teachers’ payment always accounted for the largest proportion in the twenty years, while insurance the smallest. The percentage of resources such as books was equal to that of furniture and equipment in 1981 but similar to that of other workers’ salaries in 1991.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- Fossil fuels(e.g. coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources of energy in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it a positive or negative effect? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, if, so, while, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84771573604 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94851769587 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7394421926 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168521446091 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685600230052 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11819791261 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139254723134 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152510140851 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.