Should governments build more roads to allow more vehicles, or should they improve the network of public transports? Give your opinion.
These days, every city is witnessing a rise in population and eventually, it creates more burden on traffic control. There are two important measures that any government can take to reduce the traffic congestion, build more roads to allow more vehicles or improve the network of public transports. This has raised a debate among many and this essay will explain, the advantages and disadvantages of the given topic and lead to a plausible conclusion.
First and foremost, there are myriad reasons which proponents cite for improving the network of public transports instead of building new roads. One of the most preponderant reasons is the effect of pollution by adding more number of vehicles in the city. Pollution is a growing problem, which has a huge impact on our climate change and the health of the people. Public transports can mitigate the effect of pollution to a greater extent and encourage more people to use buses and metro trains. Therefore, it is evident that the increasing number of public transports can bring the city eco-friendly.
On the other side, there are several implications for people depending on public transports. For example, people cannot reach office or schools on-time due to delay in public transports. In addition, the traffic-related issues may not be reduced just by upgrading public networks, it requires new roads to be built to improve the connectivity.
To conclude, as mitigation for growing traffic related issues, the government can either improve the public network or lay more roads. In my opinion, the government should have control on the use of own vehicles and encourage people to use public transports, while laying new roads to improve connectivity.
- Experience is a more effective way to teach rather than books. Do you really agree or disagree? 75
- In towns and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shops. Agree or disagree? 77
- Should governments build more roads to allow more vehicles, or should they improve the network of public transports? Give your opinion. 77
- In a cashless society, people use credit cards more often. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- People spend too much time on their work rather than on their personal life and experience time shortage What problems will it cause them What could be the possible solutions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ying new roads to improve connectivity.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18050541516 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87000658432 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530685920578 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8966817394 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330350743122 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107367966029 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944805887781 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195329238561 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750356056762 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.