Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that virtual library play such an important role in modern life which can take over traditional one. While many people are in favour of this view, I think that keeping conventional library is vital for our life.
On the one hand, it is obvious that online library can replace some of functions of library and it has also many benefits. Firstly, without having to waste time on travelling to the library, people who want to read something or look for information can stay at home or anywhere where the internet connected. Furthermore, using the digital library instead of coming to traditional library might help readers to quickly collect a range of knowledge in terms of other fields they concern and easy keeping up to date of news all around the world by performing a click of mouse. This is because there is a great deal of information and documents on the internet which we might not find out on a conventional library.
On the other hand, we cannot deny that there are also several reasons for keeping public libraries. The first reason is that public library is an ordinary place for gathering people of community because people can see, talk to each other and enhance their relationship instead of only reading books. As a result, they will become closer and frequently help each other if anyone was in trouble. Moreover, traditional library always supplies reliable source information since the internet is a virtual world which can be the cause of much untrue information. That is why many people still choose the public library instead.
In conclusion, although the internet can alternate some responsibility of conventional library, I strongly believe that keeping public libraries do not squander money and it is really necessary for our life as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | davidlvg1108 | 90 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-14 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | hoangquang | 61 | view |
- task 1: the number of marriages 61
- task 1: someland's main export 67
- Task 2:The consumption of the world’s resources such as oil or water is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are the causes and solutions 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects, while others claim that students should focus on the subject that they are best at or that they find interesting. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the functions') or simply say ''some functions''.
Suggestion: some of the functions; some functions
...obvious that online library can replace some of functions of library and it has also many benefit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eally necessary for our life as well.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, really, so, still, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65867761616 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563333333333 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5274638266 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188484856703 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070768213061 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494625504091 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118311358352 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313649557019 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.