Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future
Governments should always focus on the well-being of its people, that means preventing any problems for them. Even though I agree with the prompt mentioned in the essay, that “Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future”. I think that humanity and the world are behind in solving problems. Past Governments did not focus on solving either actual or future problems, and today we see consequences in our everyday life.
Sun-tanning became popular at the beginning of the 19th century, because it represented wealth and high social status. If you were tanned, it meant that you had time and economic means to go to the beach and enjoy time off. Nevertheless, it became a popular habit that was spread throughout the world. Sun burns, skin irritation and skin cancer started to appear within people that tanned regular. When that occurred, Government was concerned about the impact of sun exposing in people’s health. Government and private companies started an educational campaign. Nowadays, people are aware of the consequences when exposing skin in the sun, and people take precautions about it.
Global warming has been debated and researched in Governments for years, nevertheless proper action was not taken until recently. Unfortunately, experts agree that action was taken too late: animals, humans, and forests are suffering global warming. Polar bears are a clear example of global warming: North Pole is melting down and their option of survival is almost cero.
The previous are clear examples of how Governments did not address problems on time. They were seen as something that would become a problem in the far future and were not considered important. Today we are the generation that is going to bear all negative consequences. In spite of trying to resolve inherited problems, our generation is also going to be a victim of new problems. A good example to mention is the effects that cellphones are going to have in our health.
Right now, there are some diagnosed syndromes of the addiction that cellphones create on our everyday life, such as: FOMO (fear of missing out), constantly checking your phone, and being in touch with your contacts at all times. Nevertheless, we still do not know the effects of mobile devices in our body. Governments should focus in this problem and many other mores before it is too late for our health and our world.
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- “Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future”. 33
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 54
- We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening t 23
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
... tanned, it meant that you had time and economic means to go to the beach and enjoy time...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, i think, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11056511057 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77103695597 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560196560197 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3561036253 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5454545455 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329987465924 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814623706323 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145975056524 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175277379647 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.228563034846 0.0667264976115 343% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.