Some people believe that construction of new public building such as museums, town halls and sporting facilities is more important than renovation of the existing ones, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is believed by many individuals that forming new structures such as museums, town halls and sporting facilities is a prime pivotal step than repairing old ones. Although the rest of them do not agree with this notion. Renovation of existing constructions will help in maintaining the history and culture and new buildings will add up in the technology and many more facilities will be added up. In my opinion, the keep the old versions involves risk and the addition of new technology is difficult in them.
Firstly, Rehabilitation and reforming the centres will sustain the culture for many generations to come and people can educate each other as well as pass on to legacy. Museums are the place where history can be reviewed by generations. Keeping the existing structures will help the history to be alive and present for the education purpose and remembrance for the struggle, success and their different paths of life. For example, the showroom of history can tell us what tools our ancestors used for haunting to prepare the food.
Secondly, New buildings with a new design can allow the technical equipment to be added in a more appropriate way which will benefit the many generations to come. Designing buildings with powerful material to prevent the loss for a longer duration. Moreover, we can learn from previous mistakes and rectify them before making a fresh one and the addition of current society needs such as the addition of swimming pools in the gymnasium. I believe fresh construction is far way better as the community can remain up to date with the techniques.
In conclusion, both the views have own importance, but maintaining the construction is more costly in terms of upgradation and durability is less. Hence, nEW facility is more important than revising existing one's.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-22 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-17 | javaduddupudi | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | NAVNEET BALI | 67 | view |
- Some people feel that entertainers ( e.g. film stars, musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? What other jobs should be paid highly? 61
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food. Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won't work. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- When families have a meal together it is considered social activity. Do you think eating together is important to people in your country? 56
- Smacking children is the best way to form discipline. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The only way to improve the safety on our own roads is to have stricter punishment for driving offenders To what extent do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e pivotal step than repairing old ones. Although the rest of them do not agree with this...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02666666667 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82959753715 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9900215694 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.714285714 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245749141385 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836680770333 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941837282606 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164725522274 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110016309958 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.