As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Who can refute that the increasing amount of technology makes people lazy and languid? Smartphones nowadays can provide us with food, clothes, and any other basic necessities within a mere click. Elevators can spare us from climbing the stairs, and cars can drive us anywhere. And the process doesn’t stand still: some automobiles can literally drive us with no strain from our side. However, I cannot agree with the idea that due to the incorporation of technology humans’ ability to think has to degenerate. In fact, quite oppositely, I believe that, even though people now become more and more dependent upon technology, it has a power to make us more intelligent and skillful as well.
First of all, technology allows us to obtain useful knowledge. Never before the invention of the Internet, ordinary people could have become adept in almost any field. Reading books or learning through masters used to be a real commitment because it required a lot of time and effort. Now learning has become undemanding: people can learn how to knit, to cook, to repair a car, or any other imaginable activity.
With all the online materials and courses provided, the tendency to learn and study more – especially among the youngsters – is quite transparent. Technology allows people to expand their thinking as well as to open up new horizons. For instance, not everyone nowadays is able to study due to different reasons: some people cannot afford to attend a college, others are simply short in time. But, with the invention of the Internet, people now have an access to almost any type of education they are seeking. What is more, many new career options – such as web-design, copywriting, blogging – spread around the world.
I believe that the incorporation of technological tools into our quotidian lives can evidently improve it. Although it seems undeniable that modern technology promotes dependence and encourages consumerism and materialism, tech also can be highly valuable in terms of resources and opportunities. The ability of human beings to think for themselves cannot be possibly deteriorated due to the mere invention of technology. It is a question of choice. There are those who want to think and those who do not. For those who want to think, technology can be a great resource of knowledge, education, it can inspire people and push them forward, while for those who do not, it can be another way of staying a couch potato.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievemnts within that field. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 54
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...de us with food, clothes, and any other basic necessities within a mere click. Elevators can spar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...y allows us to obtain useful knowledge. Never before the invention of the Internet, o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...ention of the Internet, people now have an access to almost any type of education they ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, well, while, as to, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03422982885 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82842712475 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562347188264 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2889359166 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0476190476 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4761904762 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21921468147 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612809141561 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581647826627 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125222934309 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449994545996 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.