Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to
address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Human societies are made up of different kinds of people and every individual person bound to society by the law. A law protects human rights and every human propriety justified by laws. Some laws created by the government for protection and some laws are traditions, but obey just and disobey an unjust law, I do not agree with the statement for the following reason.
first of all, just and unjust law, it is hard to differentiate between them or obey and disobey a law is a personal opinion. How can someone define a just law, as every law has some void. For example, a person who is culpable for stealing something in need, justified by the law but in his opinion this is unjustified. On the other hand, some old traditions became an unwritten law to the society, for example, in some countries, there is no equality in men and women rights, women are an embargo to do a certain activity. This kind of abysmal laws are unjust, yet people follow that.
Laws are created to keep our society in order. laws depend on peoples belief and personal freedom. For example, in some countries and religion, abortion is illegal and some find that law unjust because they think it should be their personal choice. It is hard to tell or categorized laws in just and unjust from personal space. Another example is, in our school day we have to wear the uniform, but no one loves them, so according to students that is an unjust law. But according to school, the law is justified because, when students wear a uniform there is no difference between them, no one is rich or poor, everyone is equal. So, laws are just and unjust in their personal space.
On the other part, people might argue that laws which hinder personal freedom are unjust laws. Some countries try to patronize people, and we should question those laws, thus they are unjustified. Though it is important to question government laws and policies and it is unwise to tolerate everything. When we question something like some traditions, for example, women inequality, that way we can pare down the old beliefs and force government to take a step against it. But if we personally differentiate between laws that might create a divisive behavior and if everyone abidance laws in their own ways that might create anarchy in our society.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that some laws which hinder personal freedom people should question it and ask the question to the government but should not try to justify themselves that might hurt peoples belief and our society, and the government should be flexible enough to change the laws for overall better social conduct.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Jolly1111111 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Bonjourkmm | 58 | view |
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor. 50
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskA recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 70
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far 23
- The way the message is delivered is often more important than the message. 50
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing TaskToward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a Chevalier memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, includin 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...he statement for the following reason. first of all, just and unjust law, it is hard...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...een them or obey and disobey a law is a personal opinion. How can someone define a just law, as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Laws
...e created to keep our society in order. laws depend on peoples belief and personal f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'ask' instead.
Suggestion: ask
...l freedom people should question it and ask the question to the government but should not try to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, for example, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73043478261 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50953192301 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447826086957 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.9 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8078097733 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.619047619 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7619047619 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169374669069 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705059712877 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048475305085 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11405038301 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496461321982 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.