Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, contamination has become an alarming issue across the globe. There is a popular claim that internationally organizing a no-car day is a key in handling this matter while other measures are believed to be more effective. In my view, the latter is by far plausible.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that a car-free day in the worldwide can address pollution. Firstly, without cars on streets, even on a day, the quantity of exhaust fumes, which come mainly from different means of transportation, could be minimized. This means that the level of air pollution would be subjected to a decrease and the air quality would become gradually fresher and cleaner in the long term. Secondly, with regard to an event celebrated in the global scale, it seems to make great contribution in raising public awareness. As a result, people are encouraged to prioritize other vehicles such as bus or subway rather than their own vehicles, which can cultivate a better commuting habit in the community for many years to come.
On the other hand, I am in the favor of other solutions which are of more importance. What is worth noting is that the main culprit of pollution is industrial activities, thus, the government should reach the international cooperation to set a limit of exhaust fumes from industry field into the environment. For instance, the 24th C.O.P conference, held in Paris, suggested that America would have to cut down its amount of exhaust by 5%, with an aim to reduce the level of Greenhouse Effect by 10%. Furthermore, people should make the most of renewable energy from solar, wind and hydro as they are incredibly eco-friendly and cost-efficient.
In conclusion, even though it is a good idea to have a day with no cars, the exploitation of alternative energy and reaching of global collaboration are more useful ways in tackling contamination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-15 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Zari | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-22 | navkhehra | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- With the increased demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should lookfor sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places. Do theadvantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas? 89
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuels for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 73
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: P
...environment. For instance, the 24th C.O.P conference, held in Paris, suggested th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95541401274 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00342617451 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0676692044 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198325548172 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626879159988 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358571708489 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106503089084 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402558940912 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.