Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
In contemporary era, the human society forging ahead at an amazing rate in various realms. Yet, at the same time, a grave issue that governments should improve road condition or public transport has triggered intense controversy. In my opinion, government should pay more attention to public transportation enhancement.
Undeniably, it should recognize that a better network of public transportation contributes to environmental protection by the decline of carbon dioxide emission significantly. More specifically, while the public transport as practical as car to go everywhere in any time, increasing number of people would like to choose it to go out. it is therefore to say that well-designed transport systems are more effective and convenient, which stimulate people to reduce dependence on private cars.
Furthermore, it is fair to say that improving the public transportation network provides a better connectivity among cities and makes it affordable for all class of people. In particular, not everyone have private vehicle or is able to drive, so public transportation plays a vital role to some people to go out. For example, only cost ten Yuan, people can go to the city center from rural area in Beijing, which is an economical way to those who commute to work every day. As a result, public transportation can connect urban area and rural area with low-cost.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed, I highly support the idea that promoting public transportation network would benefit the country and the people for a long time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 80
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What's your opinion? Good or bad. 77
- Experience is the best teacher than traditional teaching methods. Agree/ Disagree 11
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o public transportation enhancement. Undeniably, it should recognize that a b...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ople would like to choose it to go out. it is therefore to say that well-designed ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o reduce dependence on private cars. Furthermore, it is fair to say that impr...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n area and rural area with low-cost. In conclusion, from what has been discus...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36032388664 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20038885342 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611336032389 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3037609868 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8181818182 7.25397266985 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330280759427 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12658345992 0.0925447433944 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092087936353 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191286800931 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822335017274 0.0609392437508 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.