The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The given line graphs illustrate the information regarding average amount of money spend by British parents in sport and proportion of children who have participated on three different games from 2008 and 2014.
Over this span of 6 year, there was a significant amount of money spent by each of the family in sports whereas the proportion of children participation in athletics were fluctuate overally.
As a matter of fact, spending the average amount of pounds by each family to their children’s sports starts from 20 pounds in 2008 and there was a gradual increased on these trend and reached up to a peak at about 33 pound at the end of the period. Similarly, football game holds the first position regarding the British children’s preference among the other mentioned games, starting from just above 7.5 million children in 2008 and reached to a high at about 9 million children who got participated at the end of the period. Moreover, in 2008 swimming holds the second popular game among the children in UK, rising from just under the 2.5 million children involvement in swimming to nearly five million children participated in this game, though the growth slowed over the first two years in the question.
It is interesting to note that, athletics were the least popular game in London during the initial period and this trend was than remain constant up to 2010 and showed an upward trend, overtaking that of swimming in between 2010 and 2012 it has stabilized just under 5 million at the end of the period in question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | pritam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | skelly | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries?IndicatorsCanadaJapa 78
- “Prevention is better than cure” researching and treating disease is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measure. To what extent do you agree? 73
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects sh 84
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...hildren participation in athletics were fluctuate overally. As a matter of fact, spendi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pounds'.
Suggestion: pounds
...nd and reached up to a peak at about 33 pound at the end of the period. Similarly, fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, whereas, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8893129771 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72658302584 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511450381679 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 22.4926829268 191% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.989985914 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 213.5 112.824112599 189% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.6666666667 22.9334400587 190% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 5.23603664747 251% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31594676698 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170460383585 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707634460378 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191334500077 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887496373398 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 13.2329268293 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.97 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.9970731707 175% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.