Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old
houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to
build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While someone believes that modern buildings should inherit the format of traditional houses, others state that people should construct houses in their freestyle. In my opinion, I agree with the second statement.
On the one hand, the newly built houses will cost the fortune for the construction if it follows the characters of the old ones. Firstly, it is hard to find the rare and expensive materials, nowadays such as porcelain, pottery, wood which are used to construct traditional buildings. Therefore, people have to pay not only a lot of money but also the amount of time to decorate the houses in the old style. Secondly, the maintenance fee of houses which are constructed in the traditional way also higher than their modern counterparts. For example, precious woods and rare pottery are extremely difficult to preserve because of the moister atmosphere and oxidation of the environment.
On the other hand, if people have freedom for constructing the building in freestyle, they will innovate the modern architectures. In the term of aesthetic, there will be more and more splendid and gorgeous houses appear soon. Marina Bay Sands, for instance, which is functioned as a hotel, casino, and shopping mall, is not only the world's conference but also the iconic building of Singapore. Besides, on the economical side, modern buildings can be built in a shorter time and lesser costs because people use alternative materials such as artificial sand and mortar or 3D spray paint.
In conclusion, although newly building could follow the architecture of the classic houses, in my viewpoint, I strongly agree that everyone should have the freedom to construct the houses in their own format.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | petertrung | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Tri H. Ho | 78 | view |
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six differentcountries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by day car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their modern counterparts. For example, precious woods and rare pottery are extr...
^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...architectures. In the term of aesthetic, there will be more and more splendid and...
^^
Line 3, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cial sand and mortar or 3D spray paint. In conclusion, although newly building c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16304347826 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82425386481 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561594202899 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5636502576 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.5833333333 7.06120827912 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244546363225 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879848296994 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08126304221 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170686637051 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602402175416 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.