Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the effect of experimental learning in formal education has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "whether experimental learning can work well in formal education?". Whereas it is a widely held view that experimental learning can not work well in formal education, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, modern techniques are bound up inextricably with teaching methods, which indicates they lead to both written assessment and oral exam. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between learner's performance and mental ability as well as an exponential increase in overal score. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of modern methods is correlated positively with not only formal education but also learning environment.
Within the realm of educational system, without the slightest doubt, practical courses attribute to more job opportunities, in that it would come down to skilled students, human capability, and professional career. A salient example of such attribution is private school, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take traditional examination for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint non-practical learning problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to theoterical courses, professional teachers, and even fair test. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of experimantal learning.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that experimental learning can work well in formal education. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | shiva_tootoonchi | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-31 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | IZAD | 88 | view |
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 77
- The mass media including TV, radio, and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion? 77
- Should people avoid over packaged products? Or is it the responsibility of manufactures? 11
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87074829932 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29026740487 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4056524928 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.769230769 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230232899791 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669947892363 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870587321559 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142856453815 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104938396349 0.0609392437508 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.