Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In modern times, the issue of culture protection in local places has become highly controversial. There are those who say that activity of tourism in same places should be forbidden however, others believe that this implementation is not useful for protection of culture. In this essay, I will examine both sides of argument and provide my overall opinion.
Generally speaking, there are wide range of reasons why people believe that banning of tourism in special place is not beneficial to defense of local culture. Perhaps the main reason why people in favor of this idea is because banning to entrance is not a good solution for keeping safe it. A good illustration of this is that if government support to tourism in these places and make attractive to these places, they will became popular for visitor and local people may protect them to earn more money.
Despite these arguments, there is also a case for idea that making some banning policy in cultural places would be helpful to keep safe to local culture. The main reason why people think this phenomenon because opening them to visit is detrimental for defense of local culture. For example, if numerous people come to see cultural places, they can destroy to this legacy without think their significance.
In conclusion, this is a topic which very relevant to modern society. Despite arguments to contrary, I strongly feel that banning of tourism for protection local culture in some places is not beneficial today’s world. If we want to protect our cultural legacy in these places, we can give a permission for other people to see them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | nhanluu79462 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | gianggiangvn | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | bikram12 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | DQDang | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-26 | satyam mangroliya | 89 | view |
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endagered list. What are the reason for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 56
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Nowadays the football supporters behave violently What is the cause How can we solve it 80
- In some countries around the world men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development What are the effect on society and family life 71
- the pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...e attractive to these places, they will became popular for visitor and local people ma...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tor and local people may protect them to earn more money. Despite these argumen...
^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egacy without think their significance. In conclusion, this is a topic which ver...
^^^^
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermission for other people to see them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96666666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6019434543 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4389848403 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282599103907 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110325209783 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631932608513 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185232314212 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219861755077 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.