The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments
on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary life, with the development of vehicles, traffic accidents are increasing significantly and it requires effective methods such as stricter punishments to solve that problem. However, I strongly believe that this is not the only way to make improvements to road safety, there are many alternative measures which would also be useful.
On the one hand, stricter punishments will undoubtedly act as a deterrent, so that drivers will think twice when before committing traffic offenses. There are two kinds of punishments: non-custodial sentences and prison sentences. Non-custodial sentences, such as fines or the confiscation of driving licenses, are methods which does not put the crimes in jail. In contrast, crimes who are served a prison sentence are confined in a prison as a punishment. For example, if you drive cars after drinking alcohol and be busted by polices, you will stay in the jail for several days even though there is no accident happened. The government can make these penalties become stricter by increasing the fines or raise the time that driving licenses are confiscated.
On the other hand, there are other ways to make road safety better which are not punishments. These measures can be effective for a long time and prevent drivers from causing accidents even when they are losing attention. First, the government have to build a system including banners, videos, advertisements to teach drivers that obeying the traffic rules is protecting not only others but also themselves from unfortunate accidents. Second, some countries build speed bumps on the spots where crashes happen regularly and this has resulted in reducing accident rates. Third, there are some companies invited such an useful car equipment to limit the speed, which means that drivers have to control the cars below the speed which has been set.
In conclusion, although stricter punishments show that it is a very effective method to improve road safety, I strongly believe there are many useful measures should accompany drivers penalties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | AmazingA | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Dong Tuyen | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Giselle Bui | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Giselle Bui | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-13 | linhnganguyen | 67 | view |
- International migration in UK 67
- As well as making money, businesses also have socialresponsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishmentson driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- As well as making money, businesses also have socialresponsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
..., there are some companies invited such an useful car equipment to limit the speed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3119266055 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83880351126 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4200734098 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.071428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138548084311 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453715935518 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441893055272 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876706502936 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252733430548 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.