The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph illustrates the teenager’s consumption of three different fast food groups in australia and how they changed between 1975 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the amount of pizza and hamburgers which was consumed saw a significant increase while the expenditure on fish and chips fell sharply throughout the period shown.
It can be seen from the graph that the most popular fast food of teenagers in australia was fish and chips in 1975. about 100 times consumed by the teenagers, this figure fell steadily to 85 times in 1980. In the following two decades, the fish and chips consumption went down rapidly to less than 40 times eaten per year, although, it reached to about 95 times in 1985.
Over the same period, the two trends for consumption of pizza and hamburgers were similar in a term of rise general. In the period 1975-1985, it increased sharply to about 85 times in the hamburgers used and reached a peak of 100 times in 1995 and then remained in the last 5 years. pizza was accounted the lowest expenditure in 1975, at about 5 times per year. this number rose rapidly to more than 85 times in 1995 and was consistent at the end of period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 73
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better than through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The graph shows the percentage of adolescents following a vegerarian diet. 73
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph illustrates the teenager&...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: About
...n australia was fish and chips in 1975. about 100 times consumed by the teenagers, th...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pizza
... and then remained in the last 5 years. pizza was accounted the lowest expenditure in...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ure in 1975, at about 5 times per year. this number rose rapidly to more than 85 tim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71291866029 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5846799608 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8299395118 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177537798599 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828809707325 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113135680295 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136482071283 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114991334308 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.