two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Essay topics:

two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Two maps delineate some alterations of way to city hospital between 2007 and 2010.

In general, the road became more developed by constructing more infrastructures and upgrading intersection, namely car parks, bus station and roundabout.

From 2007 to 2010, surrounding the hospital was the space area was adjacent to city hospital which developed into the public car park to the north-east and a staff car park to the southern side of the hospital. After destroying all bus stops on the two side of hospital road, they built a bus station on the site where the vacant ground to south-west of hospital, which facilitated the road system for accessing to hospital.

The most striking feature is the appearance of two new roundabouts in the centre. The first one was constructed at the three-way junction of the Ring road and the hospital road while the second one was erected at the four-way junction of City road and Hospital road.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-07 ThHuong 78 view
2024-07-30 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... city hospital between 2007 and 2010. In general, the road became more develop...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar parks, bus station and roundabout. From 2007 to 2010, surrounding the hospi...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oad system for accessing to hospital. The most striking feature is the appeara...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03184713376 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82834106233 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554140127389 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8191471011 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360957536141 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170742638533 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118777587651 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222484307752 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129243272485 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.